Stanford Medicine News Center - March 15th, 2017 - by Erin Digitale
Five types of pediatric brain cancer were safely and effectively treated in mice by an antibody that causes immune cells to engulf and eat tumors without hurting healthy brain cells, according to a new study by researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine.
The immune therapy studied consists of antibodies against a cellular “don’t eat me” signal called CD47. Developed at Stanford, the anti-CD47 antibodies are already being tested in early clinical trials in adults who have tumors outside the central nervous system. But they have never been tried against pediatric brain tumors until now.
The new study pitted anti-CD47 antibodies against human cancer cells that had been grown in a dish and implanted in mice. The tests targeted five aggressive pediatric brain tumors: Group 3 medulloblastoma, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor, primitive neuroectodermal tumor, pediatric glioblastoma and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.
“For many of these tumors, there’s just no treatment,” said Samuel Cheshier, MD, PhD, assistant professor of neurosurgery. “Diagnosis is synonymous with a death sentence.”
The study was published March 15 in Science Translational Medicine. Cheshier shares senior authorship of the paper with Irving Weissman, MD, the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Professor for Clinical Investigation in Cancer Research and professor of pathology and of developmental biology. The lead authors are postdoctoral scholar Sharareh Gholamin, MD, and senior research scientist Siddhartha Mitra, PhD.
‘Very, very active tumor-killing’
Many childhood brain tumors are inoperable. Some also lack effective chemotherapy drugs, or require radiation and chemotherapy so toxic to the developing brain that they cause devastating long-term side effects. In contrast with the toxic profile of existing treatments, the preclinical trials conducted by Cheshier’s team indicate that anti-CD47 antibodies specifically target cancer cells while leaving healthy brain cells alone.
“The most exciting aspect of our findings is that no matter what kind of brain tumor we tested it against, this treatment worked really well in the animal models,” said Cheshier, who is also a pediatric neurosurgeon at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford. In mice that had been implanted with both normal human brain cells and human brain cancer cells, “there was no toxicity to normal human cells but very, very active tumor-killing in vivo,” he said.
Given the encouraging results of the new study and the ongoing research on anti-CD47 antibodies in adults, the antibodies are expected to reach clinical trials in children with brain cancer in one to two years, he added.
The anti-CD47 antibodies help the immune system to detect an important difference between cancerous and healthy cells: Cancer cells make “eat me” signals that are displayed on their cell surfaces, while healthy cells do not. However, cancer cells hide these “eat me” signals by producing large quantities of CD47, a “don’t eat me” protein that is found on the surface of both healthy and malignant cells. When CD47 is blocked by antibodies, immune cells called macrophages can detect the cancer cells’ “eat me” signals. Macrophages then selectively target, engulf and destroy the cancer cells without harming healthy cells, because normal cells lack the “eat me” signals.
The Stanford team conducted a long series of experiments using different combinations of tumor cells and healthy cells in culture, as well as in various mouse models in which human brain cancer cells had been implanted in mice. Highlights of their experiments included the following:
- The team confirmed that all the various cancers tested express the CD47 “don’t eat me” signal, as well as an “eat me” signal called CRT.
- In a dish, Group 3 medulloblastoma cells treated with anti-CD47 antibodies were engulfed and eaten by macrophages, while healthy brain cells were not harmed.
- In mice with a partially functioning immune system that had been transplanted with any of the five types of pediatric brain tumors, treating the mice with anti-CD47 antibodies significantly reduced the presence of those tumors.
- In mice, the antibody crossed the blood-brain barrier in significant amounts after being injected into the peritoneal space. This was an important finding because some other forms of immunotherapy are unable to cross this barrier. In mice transplanted with Group 3 medulloblastoma, anti-CD47 antibodies were more effective at treating the primary tumor if given in the peritoneal space, but better at treating metastases if given directly into the cerebrospinal fluid.
- Mixing healthy human neural progenitor cells with anti-CD47 antibodies did not cause any damage to the neural progenitor cells, either in their viability or ability to proliferate, suggesting that the antibodies would not interfere with brain development.
- In mice with a fully functioning immune system that had been implanted with cells from a high-grade glioma cell line, anti-CD47 antibodies significantly prolonged survival of the animals, from an average of 21 days for those in the untreated group to 32 and 38 days for those receiving low and high doses of antibodies, respectively.
- In mice treated with anti-CD47 antibodies, their brains, examined after treatment, showed that macrophages concentrated at the sites of the tumors. Further tests showed that macrophages got inside the tumors.
The anti-CD47 antibodies did not completely eliminate all tumors, suggesting that the antibodies may not be able to completely penetrate large tumors, the researchers noted.
To maximize their effects, the antibodies will likely need to be combined with other forms of cancer treatment, a concept the researchers plan to investigate further, Cheshier said. In the future, patients may receive combinations of immune therapies and lower doses of standard cancer treatments, he said, adding, “The question is: Can we wisely combine immune therapies and other approaches to make cancer treatment more efficacious and less toxic?”
Anti-CD47 antibodies also may have an advantage over other immunotherapies in that they activate macrophages, which completely engulf and eat cancer cells, Cheshier noted. “In many forms of immunotherapy, the cells you target die and spill their contents, which can cause dysregulated immune responses,” he said. Anti-CD47 antibodies may produce fewer such side effects, though the idea remains to be tested.
Other Stanford co-authors of the paper are medical students Abdullah Feroze, Rogelio Esparza and Michael Zhang; postdoctoral scholars Suzana Kahn, PhD, Anne Volkmer, MD and Stephen Willingham, PhD; research assistants Anitha Ponnuswami, Theresa Storm, Cyndhavi Narayanan and Pauline Chu; senior research associate Jie Liu, MD, PhD; undergraduate research associate Chase Richard; Aaron McCarthy, a former life sciences research professional and animal colony manager; Patricia Lovelace, research and development engineer; Simone Schubert, life science researcher; visiting scholar Gregor Hutter, MD, PhD; Griffith Harsh, MD, professor of neurosurgery; Michelle Monje, MD, PhD, assistant professor of neurology; Yoon-Jae Cho, MD, a former assistant professor of neurology and neurological sciences; Ravi Majeti, MD, PhD, associate professor of medicine; senior scientist Jens Volkmer, MD; Paul Fisher, MD, professor of pediatrics; Gerald Grant, MD, associate professor of neurosurgery; Gary Steinberg, MD, PhD, professor of neurosurgery; Hannes Vogel, MD, professor of pathology and of pediatrics; and Michael Edwards, MD, professor of neurosurgery.
Cheshier, Monje, Majeti, Fisher, Grant and Edwards are members of Stanford’s Child Health Research Institute. Cheshier, Weissman, Harsh, Monje, Majeti, Fisher, Grant, Vogel and Edwards are members of the Stanford Cancer Institute. Weissman is the director of the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and of the Ludwig Center for Cancer Stem Cell Research and Medicine at Stanford.
Scientists from SickKids, the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto; University Hospital, Dusseldorf; and Johns Hopkins University also contributed to the study.
The study was funded by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant NINDSK08NS070926); the National Cancer Institute (grant P30CA006973); the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine; the Price Family Charitable Fund; the Center for Children’s Brain Tumors at Stanford; St. Baldrick’s Foundation; the American Brain Tumor Foundation; the Seibel Stem Cell Institute; the Pew Charitable Trusts; the Dr. Mildred-Scheel Foundation/German Cancer Aid; the German Research Foundation; the McKenna Claire Foundation; the Matthew Larson Foundation; Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation; The Cure Starts Now; the Lyla Nsouli Foundation; the Dylan Jewett, Connor Johnson, Zoey Ganesh, Dylan Frick, Abigail Jensen, Wayland Villars and Jennifer Kranz memorial funds; the Virginia and D. K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research; the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health; the National Institutes of Health (grant UL1TR001085); the Tashia and John Morgridge Endowed Pediatric Faculty Scholar and Fellowships Awards; and the Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Endowed Faculty Scholarship in Pediatric Cancer and Blood Diseases. The study was also funded by gifts from George Landegger; Rider and Victoria McDowell; Charles Comey and Judith Huang; and Colin and Jenna Fisher.
Stanford’s Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences also supported the work.